[Concordance of medication prescription records in the hospitalised surgical patient]. / Concordancia de los registros de prescripción de medicamentos en el paciente quirúrgico hospitalizado.

INTRODUCTION: Electronic prescription is the prescription system that allows healthcare professionals to send medication prescriptions directly to community pharmacies and the outpatient unit of Hospital Pharmacy Services for dispensing. However, there is difficulty in obtaining a reliable pharmacotherapeutic history in chronic patients through electronic prescription upon hospital admission as a critical point for adequate treatment adaptation. Therefore, the pharmacist as a member of the multidisciplinary team must ensure, through medication conciliation, an adequate transition of care through the correct management of the treatment that the chronic patient requires during their hospitalization. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of electronic prescription records for routine chronic treatment by analyzing the concordance of the electronic prescription. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional and retrospective study at the General University Hospital of Elche. Hospitalized patients in charge of the Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Urology and Neurosurgery Services in which the responsible doctor requested medication reconciliation by the Pharmacy Service between January 2022 - December 2022 were included. RESULTS: 378 patients, 209 (55.3%) women and 169 (44.7%) men, with a mean age±standard deviation of 71.0±11.6 years and 69.0±11.8 years, respectively. The total percentage of patients with discrepancies in the electronic prescription with respect to the usual chronic treatment was 60.6%, reflecting that only 39.4% of the patients had non-discordant electronic prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of hospitalized surgical patients present discrepancies in the medications prescribed in the home electronic prescription, which justifies the importance of treatment reconciliation upon admission carried out by hospital pharmacists.

Validated medication deprescribing instruments for patients with palliative care needs: a systematic review / Instrumentos validados de desprescripción de medicamentos para los pacientes que reciben cuidados paliativos: una revisión sistemática

Objectives: Patients with life-limiting illnesses are prone to unnecessary polypharmacy. Deprescribing tools may contribute to minimizing negative outcomes. Thus, the aims of the study were to identify validated instruments for deprescribing inappropriate medications for patients with palliative care needs and to assess the impact on clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, and WEB OF SCIENCE databases (until May 2021). A manual search was performed in the references of enrolled articles. The screening, eligibility, extraction, and bias risk assessment were carried out by 2 independent researchers. Experimental and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Results: Out of the 5791 studies retrieved, after excluding duplicates (n = 1050), conducting title/abstract screening (n = 4741), and full reading (n = 41), only 1 study met the inclusion criteria. In this included study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted, which showed a high level of bias risk overall. Adults 75 years or older (n = 130) with limited life expectancy and polypharmacy were allocated to 2 groups [intervention arm (deprescribing); and control arm (usual care)]. Deprescribing was performed with the aid of the STOPPFrail tool. The mean number of inappropriate medications and monthly medication costs were significantly lower in the intervention arm. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of unscheduled hospital presentations, falls, fractures, mortality, and quality of life. Conclusions: Despite the availability of several instruments to support deprescribing in patients with palliative care needs, only 1 of them has undergone validation and robust assessment for effectiveness in clinical practice. The STOPPFrail tool appears to reduce the number of inappropriate medications for older people with limited life expectancy (and probably palliative care needs)...(AU)

Objetivo: Los pacientes con enfermedades terminales son propensos a la polifarmacia innecesaria. Las herramientas de desprescripción pueden contribuir a minimizar los resultados negativos. Por lo tanto, los objetivos del estudio fueron identificar instrumentos validados para la desprescripción de medicamentos inapropiados en pacientes con necesidades de cuidados paliativos y evaluar el impacto en los resultados clínicos, humanísticos y económicos. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE y WEB OF SCIENCE (hasta mayo de 2021). Se realizó una búsqueda manual en las referencias de los artículos incluidos. La selección, elegibilidad, extracción y evaluación del riesgo de sesgo se llevaron a cabo por dos investigadores independientes. Se aceptó la inclusión de estudios observacionales y experimentales. Resultados: De los 5791 estudios recuperados, después de excluir duplicados (n = 1050), realizar la selección de títulos/resúmenes (n = 4741) y la lectura completa (n = 41), solo un estudio cumplió con los criterios de inclusión. En este estudio incluido, se realizó un ensayo controlado aleatorizado, que mostró un alto nivel de riesgo de sesgo en general. A los adultos de 75 años o más (n = 130) con esperanza de vida limitada y polifarmacia se les asignaron dos grupos [grupo de intervención (desprescripción) y grupo de control (atención habitual)]. Se realizó la desprescripción con la ayuda de la herramienta STOPPFrail. El número promedio de medicamentos inapropiados y los costos mensuales de los medicamentos fueron significativamente más bajos en el grupo de intervención. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en términos de presentaciones hospitalarias no programadas, caídas, fracturas, mortalidad y calidad de vida. Conclusiones: A pesar de la disponibilidad de varias herramientas para apoyar la deprescripción en pacientes con necesidades de cuidados paliativos...(AU)

Instrumentos validados de desprescripción de medicamentos para los pacientes que reciben cuidados paliativos: una revisión sistemática / Validated medication deprescribing instruments for patients with palliative care needs: a systematic review

Objectives: Patients with life-limiting illnesses are prone to unnecessary polypharmacy. Deprescribing tools may contribute to minimizing negative outcomes. Thus, the aims of the study were to identify validated instruments for deprescribing inappropriate medications for patients with palliative care needs and to assess the impact on clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, and WEB OF SCIENCE databases (until May 2021). A manual search was performed in the references of enrolled articles. The screening, eligibility, extraction, and bias risk assessment were carried out by 2 independent researchers. Experimental and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Results: Out of the 5791 studies retrieved, after excluding duplicates (n = 1050), conducting title/abstract screening (n = 4741), and full reading (n = 41), only 1 study met the inclusion criteria. In this included study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted, which showed a high level of bias risk overall. Adults 75 years or older (n = 130) with limited life expectancy and polypharmacy were allocated to 2 groups [intervention arm (deprescribing); and control arm (usual care)]. Deprescribing was performed with the aid of the STOPPFrail tool. The mean number of inappropriate medications and monthly medication costs were significantly lower in the intervention arm. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of unscheduled hospital presentations, falls, fractures, mortality, and quality of life. Conclusions: Despite the availability of several instruments to support deprescribing in patients with palliative care needs, only 1 of them has undergone validation and robust assessment for effectiveness in clinical practice. The STOPPFrail tool appears to reduce the number of inappropriate medications for older people with limited life expectancy (and probably palliative care needs)...(AU)

Objetivo: Los pacientes con enfermedades terminales son propensos a la polifarmacia innecesaria. Las herramientas de desprescripción pueden contribuir a minimizar los resultados negativos. Por lo tanto, los objetivos del estudio fueron identificar instrumentos validados para la desprescripción de medicamentos inapropiados en pacientes con necesidades de cuidados paliativos y evaluar el impacto en los resultados clínicos, humanísticos y económicos. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE y WEB OF SCIENCE (hasta mayo de 2021). Se realizó una búsqueda manual en las referencias de los artículos incluidos. La selección, elegibilidad, extracción y evaluación del riesgo de sesgo se llevaron a cabo por dos investigadores independientes. Se aceptó la inclusión de estudios observacionales y experimentales. Resultados: De los 5791 estudios recuperados, después de excluir duplicados (n = 1050), realizar la selección de títulos/resúmenes (n = 4741) y la lectura completa (n = 41), solo un estudio cumplió con los criterios de inclusión. En este estudio incluido, se realizó un ensayo controlado aleatorizado, que mostró un alto nivel de riesgo de sesgo en general. A los adultos de 75 años o más (n = 130) con esperanza de vida limitada y polifarmacia se les asignaron dos grupos [grupo de intervención (desprescripción) y grupo de control (atención habitual)]. Se realizó la desprescripción con la ayuda de la herramienta STOPPFrail. El número promedio de medicamentos inapropiados y los costos mensuales de los medicamentos fueron significativamente más bajos en el grupo de intervención. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en términos de presentaciones hospitalarias no programadas, caídas, fracturas, mortalidad y calidad de vida. Conclusiones: A pesar de la disponibilidad de varias herramientas para apoyar la deprescripción en pacientes con necesidades de cuidados paliativos...(AU)

Lineamientos técnicos para las buenas prácticas de prescripción y dispensación / Technical guidelines for good prescribing and dispensing practices

Los medicamentos son una herramienta fundamental en el tratamiento de la enfermedad y la terapéutica moderna, los que al utilizarse sobre la base de criterios científico-técnicos, permiten la obtención de importantes beneficios sanitarios representados por la prevención, diagnóstico, curación, atenuación y tratamiento de las enfermedades. Sin embargo, cuando los medicamentos se utilizan de manera inapropiada se convierten en una amenaza para la salud individual y colectiva. El presente documento aborda la prescripción y dispensación desde su esencia como un proceso racional y metódico que, basándose en los antecedentes diagnósticos pertinentes, permite la mejor elección posible de los medicamentos requeridos por el usuario

Medicines are a fundamental tool in the treatment of disease and modern therapeutics, which, when used on the basis of scientific-technical criteria, allow the achievement of important health benefits represented by prevention, diagnosis, cure, attenuation and treatment of diseases. However, when drugs are used inappropriately they become a threat to individual and collective health. The present document addresses prescription and dispensing from its essence as a rational and methodical process that, based on the relevant diagnostic background, allows the best possible choice of drugs required by the user

Perfil de uso de tigeciclina en un hospital universitario en Chile

Introducción: El uso de tigeciclina ha ido en aumento en los últimos años, debido al incremento de la resistencia bacteriana y la escasez de alternativas terapéuticas. Objetivo: Caracterizar y evaluar las prescripciones de tigeciclina en pacientes internados en un hospital universitario, durante los años 2017 y 2018. Metodología: Estudio observacional retrospectivo, donde se caracterizaron los pacientes, las terapias, la microbiología asociada, los desenlaces clínicos y las reacciones adversas asociadas a los tratamientos con tigeciclina. Se determinó la proporción de prescripciones apropiadas por un comité de expertos y el consumo de tigeciclina medido en DDD/100 camas-día. Resultados: Se caracterizaron 89 pacientes, de los cuales 67 (75,3%) cumplieron los criterios de selección. El 53,7% de los pacientes eran hombres, con una edad promedio de 60 ± 15 años. El principal motivo de hospitalización fue quirúrgico (65,7%). El 67,1% de los tratamientos con tigeciclina se inició en una Unidad de Paciente Critico y el foco de infección predominante fue abdominal (64,3%). El 50% de las terapias con tigeciclina fueron dirigidas según la microbiología identificada. En 65,7% de los casos se usó tigeciclina como monoterapia en la dosis habitual (62,9%). Náuseas (8,6%), diarrea (7,1%) y vómitos (4,3%) fueron los efectos adversos más reportados. El 84,3% de los tratamientos se consideraron apropiados. El año 2017 se consumió 0,4 DDD/100 camas-día y 0,6 DDD/100 camas/día el 2018, siendo la UCI el servicio que presentó el mayor uso en ambos años. Discusión: Tigeciclina fue utilizada principalmente en monoterapia para el tratamiento de infecciones intraabdominales en pacientes hospitalizados, por motivos quirúrgicos, en una unidad de paciente crítico, en las dosis habituales recomendadas de 100 mg como dosis de carga seguida de 50 mg cada 12 hs IV. En 50% de los casos, la terapia fue dirigida según microbiología. Los eventos adversos más habituales fueron los gastrointestinales. Conclusión: La mayoría de las terapias prescritas fueron consideradas apropiadas por el comité de expertos.

Background: The use of tigecycline has been increasing in recent years, due to increase in bacterial resistance and the scarcity of therapeutics alternatives. Aim: To characterize and evaluate the tigecycline prescriptions of patients hospitalized in a university hospital, during the years 2017 and 2018. Methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out, where the patients, the therapies, the associated microbiology, the clinical outcomes and the adverse reactions associated with tigecycline were characterized. The proportion of appropriate prescriptions was determined by committee of experts and the consumption of tigecycline measure in DDD/100 bed-days. Results: 89 patients who used tigecycline were characterized, of which 67 (75.3%) met the selection criteria. 53.7% of the patients were male, with a mean age of 60 +/- 15 years The main reason for hospitalization was surgical (65.7%). 67.1% of the treatments with tigecycline were started in a critical patient unit and the predominant focus of the infection was the abdomen (64.3%). 50% of the therapies with tigecycline were ordered according to the identified microbiology. In 65.7% of the cases, tigecyclin was used as monotherapy at the usual dose (62.9%). Nausea (8.6%), diarrhea (7.1%) and vomiting (4.3%) were the most reported adverse events. 84.3% of the treatments were considered appropriate. In 2017, 0.4 DDD/100 bed/days were consumed and 0.6 DDD/100 bed/days in 2018, with de ICU being the service that presented the highest use in both years. Discussion: Tigecycline was mainly used as monotherapy for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections in patients hospitalized for surgical reasons in a critical patient unit at the usual doses of 100 mg loading followed by 50 mg every 12 hours IV. In 50% of the case the therapy was directed according to microbiology. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal. Conclusion: Most of the prescribed therapies were considered appropriate by the expert committee.

Avaliação emocional e cognitiva em grupos de idosos diferenciando a prescrição social / Emotional and cognitive evaluation in groups of older adults differentiating social prescription / Evaluación emocional y cognitiva en grupos de adultos mayores diferenciando la prescripción social

Resumo A Prescrição Social (PS) foi desenvolvida sobretudo no Reino Unido e foi reconhecida pelo Serviço Nacional de Saúde britânico como uma abordagem inovadora para apoiar a sustentabilidade do sistema de saúde. A PS tem o potencial de promover parcerias entre estruturas comunitárias, ajudando assim a ligar os sectores social e da saúde para formar um sistema local de PS. O nosso objetivo foi avaliar o desempenho de um programa de PS, examinando o impacto no desempenho cognitivo e no bem-estar emocional. Foi aplicado um questionário a uma amostra de 60 idosos não institucionalizados, com idades compreendidas entre os 66 e os 96 anos. Foram definidos dois grupos de 30 participantes: Grupo PS (que foram incluídos no programa de prescrição social) e Grupo Controlo (que não beneficiam de qualquer programa). Todos os instrumentos foram validados para a população portuguesa. O bem-estar emocional foi avaliado através da Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale e o desempenho cognitivo foi avaliado através do Mini-Mental State Examination. Os resultados mostraram que o grupo PS tem níveis mais baixos de comprometimento cognitivo e uma pontuação média de autoestima mais elevada, mas não foram detetadas diferenças estatisticamente significativas na escala de desempenho cognitivo. Estes resultados sugerem que os programas de PS têm um impacto especial e positivo na autoestima dos idosos. Esta evidência realça a importância de considerar estes programas como um eixo estratégico de intervenção para o envelhecimento ativo. Constatou-se a mais-valia da PS como mecanismo potenciador de benefícios associados à saúde e ao bem-estar. Futuras investigações deverão ser realizadas com acesso a uma amostra mais alargada e explorar outras variáveis dependentes.

Abstract Social Prescription (SP) has been developed mostly in the United Kingdom (UK) and has been recognised by the UK National Health Service as an innovative approach to support the sustainability of the health system. It also has the potential to promote partnerships between community structures, thereby helping to link the health and social sectors to form a local SP system. Our objective was evaluate the performance of a SP programme, examining the impact on cognitive performance and emotional well-being. A questionnaire was applied to a sample of 60 non-institutionalized older adults, aged 66-96 years. Two groups of 30 participants were defined: SP Group (that were included in the social prescription program) and Control Group (that do not benefit from any program). All the instruments were validated for the Portuguese population. Emotional well-being was assessed using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and cognitive performance was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Results showed that the SP group has lower levels of cognitive impairment and a higher average self-esteem score, but no statistically significant differences were detected in the cognitive performance scale. These results suggest that the SP programs have a special and positive impact on the self-esteem of the elderly. This evidence highlights the importance of considering these programs as a strategic intervention axis for active aging. The added value of SP as a mechanism that fosters benefits associated with health and well-being was noted. Future investigations should be conducted with access to a larger sample and explore other dependent variables.

Resumen La prescripción social (PS) se desarrolló principalmente en el Reino Unido y ha sido reconocida por el Servicio Nacional de Salud británico como un enfoque innovador para apoyar la sostenibilidad del sistema sanitario. También tiene el potencial de promover asociaciones entre estructuras comunitarias, ayudando así a vincular los sectores social y sanitario para formar un sistema local de PS. Nuestro objetivo era evaluar el rendimiento de un programa de SP examinando el impacto sobre el rendimiento cognitivo y el bienestar emocional. Se administró un cuestionario a una muestra de 60 ancianos no institucionalizados de edades comprendidas entre los 66 y los 96 años. Se definieron dos grupos de 30 participantes: Grupo PS (que fueron incluidos en el programa de prescripción social) y Grupo Control (que no se beneficiaron de ningún programa). Todos los instrumentos fueron validados para la población portuguesa. El bienestar emocional se evaluó mediante la Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale y el rendimiento cognitivo mediante el Mini-Mental State Examination. Los resultados mostraron que el grupo PS tenía niveles más bajos de deterioro cognitivo y una puntuación media de autoestima más alta, pero no se detectaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la escala de rendimiento cognitivo. Estos resultados sugieren que los programas de PS tienen un impacto especial y positivo en la autoestima de las personas mayores. Esta evidencia pone de manifiesto la importancia de considerar estos programas como un eje estratégico de intervención para el envejecimiento activo. Se constató el valor añadido de la PS como mecanismo para potenciar los beneficios para la salud y el bienestar. Futuras investigaciones deberían realizarse con acceso a una muestra más amplia y explorar otras variables dependientes.

Validated medication deprescribing instruments for patients with palliative care needs palliative care: A systematic review. / [Artículo traducido] Instrumentos validados de desprescripción de medicamentos para los pacientes con necesidades de cuidados paliativos: una revisión sistemática.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with life-limiting illnesses are prone to unnecessary polypharmacy. Deprescribing tools may contribute to minimizing negative outcomes. Thus, the aims of the study were to identify validated instruments for deprescribing inappropriate medications for patients with palliative care needs and to assess the impact on clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, and WEB OF SCIENCE databases (until May 2021). A manual search was performed in the references of enrolled articles. The screening, eligibility, extraction, and bias risk assessment were carried out by two independent researchers. Experimental and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Out of the 5,791 studies retrieved, after excluding duplicates (n = 1,050), conducting title/abstract screening (n = 4,741), and full reading (n = 41), only one study met the inclusion criteria. In this included study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted, which showed a high level of bias risk overall. Adults 75 years or older (n = 130) with limited life expectancy and polypharmacy were allocated to two groups [intervention arm (deprescribing); and control arm (usual care)]. Deprescribing was performed with the aid of the STOPPFrail tool. The mean number of inappropriate medications and monthly medication costs were significantly lower in the intervention arm. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of unscheduled hospital presentations, falls, fractures, mortality, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of several instruments to support deprescribing in patients with palliative care needs, only one of them has undergone validation and robust assessment for effectiveness in clinical practice. The STOPPFrail tool appears to reduce the number of inappropriate medications for older people with limited life expectancy (and probably palliative care needs) and decrease the monthly costs of pharmacotherapy. Nevertheless, the impact on patient safety and humanistic outcomes remain unclear.

Variaciones de la conductividad y cambios en el sodio plasmático durante hemodiálisis relacionado con el cambio de monitor / Conductivity variations and changes in serum sodium concentration during dialysis related to monitor switching

Introducción El gradiente de sodio durante las sesiones es uno de los factores clave en el balance de este ion en los pacientes en hemodiálisis; sin embargo, hasta la aparición de los nuevos monitores con módulos de sodio, las diferencias entre el sodio prescrito y el medido han sido poco estudiadas. El objetivo del presente estudio fue comparar el impacto del cambio del monitor 5008 Cordiax al nuevo monitor 6008 Cordiax sobre los resultados de la conductividad real medida, del sodio plasmático inicial y final. Material y métodos Se incluyeron 106 pacientes en hemodiálisis. Cada paciente recibió dos sesiones de diálisis en las que solo se varió el monitor. Las variables recogidas fueron: el concentrado, sodio y bicarbonato prescritos, conductividad real, sodio plasmático inicial y final medidos por dialisancia iónica y se calculó el cambio de la concentración de sodio plasmático durante el tratamiento o delta de sodio (ΔPNa). Resultados El cambio de monitor de diálisis mostró pequeñas diferencias, aunque significativas, en el sodio plasmático inicial (138,14 mmol/L con 5008 vs. 138,81 mmol/L con 6008) y final (139,58 mmol/L vs. 140,97 mmol/L), así como en la conductividad real obtenida (13,97 vs. 14,10 mS/cm). El ΔPNa también aumento significativamente. Conclusión El cambio de monitor 5008 a 6008 se asocia a un aumento en la conductividad, un sodio plasmático más elevado y un incremento en el ΔPNa. El conocer y confirmar este cambio permitirá individualizar la prescripción de sodio, evitar posibles efectos indeseables y podría ser el estudio preliminar para explorar el nuevo biosensor de control de sodio incorporado en la nueva generación de monitores (AU)

Introduction The sodium gradient during hemodialysis sessions is one of the key factors in sodium balance in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease; however, until the appearance of the new monitors with sodium modules, the differences between prescribed and measured sodium have been understudied. The present study aimed to compare the impact on the measured conductivity and the initial and final plasma sodium after changing the 5008 Cordiax to the new 6008 Cordiax monitor. Material and methods 106 patients on hemodialysis were included. Each patient underwent 2 dialysis sessions in which only the monitor was varied. The variables collected were dialysate, sodium and bicarbonate prescribed, real conductivity, initial and final plasma sodium measured, and the calculated sodium gradient (ΔPNa). Results The change of dialysis monitor showed small but statistically significant differences in the initial (138.14 mmol/L with 5008 vs. 138.81 mmol/L with 6008) and final plasma sodium (139.58 mmol/L vs. 140.97 mmol/L), as well as in the actual conductivity obtained (13.97 vs. 14.1 mS/cm). The ΔPNa also increased significantly. Conclusión The change from 5008 to 6008 monitor is associated with increased conductivity, leading the patient to end the sessions with higher plasma sodium and ΔPNa. Knowing and confirming this change will allow us to individualize the sodium prescription and avoid possible undesirable effects. It could be the preliminary study to explore the new sodium biosensor incorporated into the new generation of monitors (AU)

Fotovoz de activos en Cornellà de Llobregat, una experiencia de los profesionales sanitarios para conocer la comunidad / Photovoice of Cornellà de Llobregat assets, an experience for healthcare professionals to get to know the community

Introducción. La prescripción social es el proceso de recomendación de activos beneficiosos para la salud y bienestar. Para ello es necesario conocer los activos de la comunidad de trabajo. El fotovoz es una técnica de investigación participativa que permite conocer una comunidad con la fotografía.Objetivos. Elaborar un fotovoz con los activos de salud de la comunidad.Métodos. Se formó a profesionales y se hizo un paseo comunitario para identificar y fotografiar activos de la comunidad. Se hizo una puesta en común de las fotografías recogidas y una selección. Se creó un fotovoz que se expuso en el centro.Resultados. Un total de 17 profesionales sanitarios hicieron 91 fotografías a activos. Se hizo una selección y se llevó a cabo una discusión, y como resultado, se creó un fotovoz con 16 activos.Conclusión. El fotovoz es un proceso participativo basado en la comunidad que permite mejorar el conocimiento que los profesionales sanitarios tienen sobre los recursos de salud disponibles en su entorno y hacer una prescripción social. (AU)

Introduction. Social prescribing is the process of recommending assets beneficial to health and well-being. To do this, it is necessary to get to know the assets of the working community. Photovoice is a participatory research technique that enables getting to know a community with photography.Objectives. Prepare a Photovoice with community health assets.Methods. Professionals were trained and a community walk was held to identify and photograph community assets. A sharing the photographs collected and made a selection. A Photovoice was created and exhibited in the centre.Results. A total of 17 healthcare professionals took 91 asset photographs. A selection was made and a discussion held. As a result a photovoice was created with 16 assets.Conclusion. PhotoVoice is a community-based participatory process that enables improving health professionals' knowledge of the health resources available in their setting and enables social prescribing. (AU)

Validated medication deprescribing instruments for patients with palliative care needs a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with life-limiting illnesses are prone to unnecessary polypharmacy. Deprescribing tools may contribute to minimizing negative outcomes. Thus, the aims of the study were to identify validated instruments for deprescribing inappropriate medications for patients with palliative care needs and to assess the impact on clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, and WEB OF SCIENCE databases (until May 2021). A manual search was performed in the references of enrolled articles. The screening, eligibility, extraction, and bias risk assessment were carried out by 2 independent researchers. Experimental and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Out of the 5791 studies retrieved, after excluding duplicates (n = 1050), conducting title/abstract screening (n = 4741), and full reading (n = 41), only 1 study met the inclusion criteria. In this included study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted, which showed a high level of bias risk overall. Adults 75 years or older (n = 130) with limited life expectancy and polypharmacy were allocated to 2 groups [intervention arm (deprescribing); and control arm (usual care)]. Deprescribing was performed with the aid of the STOPPFrail tool. The mean number of inappropriate medications and monthly medication costs were significantly lower in the intervention arm. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of unscheduled hospital presentations, falls, fractures, mortality, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of several instruments to support deprescribing in patients with palliative care needs, only 1 of them has undergone validation and robust assessment for effectiveness in clinical practice. The STOPPFrail tool appears to reduce the number of inappropriate medications for older people with limited life expectancy (and probably palliative care needs) and decrease the monthly costs of pharmacotherapy. Nevertheless, the impact on patient safety and humanistic outcomes remain unclear.

¿Recomendar la frecuencia de administración de medicamentos en la prescripción electrónica mejora su adecuación? Estudio antes-después / Does recommending the dosing frequency in the electronic prescription improve its adequacy? Before and after study

Objetivo: Analizar si informar la frecuencia de administración (FA) en el módulo de prescripción de la estación clínica de atención primaria (ECAP) del Institut Català de la Salut (ICS) mejora la adecuación de la FA de las prescripciones. Diseño: Estudio de adecuación antes-después con control no equivalente de prescripciones sin cambios en la FA. El periodo de estudio incluye desde el 1 de septiembre de 2019 hasta el 29 de febrero de 2020.Emplazamiento: Ámbito de atención primaria. Participantes: Se incluyen las prescripciones de los medicamentos con una única FA adecuada o mayoritariamente adecuada realizadas por los médicos de familia del ICS durante el periodo de estudio.IntervenciónRecomendar la FA adecuada en el módulo de prescripción. Mediciones principales: Adecuación definida como la coincidencia entre la FA prescrita y la FA adecuada. Resultados: Tras la intervención se produjo un aumento del 22,75% de prescripciones con FA adecuada. El mayor aumento se dio en los medicamentos del sistema genitourinario y hormonas sexuales. En términos absolutos, el grupo de antiinfecciosos es el que obtuvo más prescripciones con FA adecuada entre los dos periodos. Conclusiones: La intervención aumentó la adecuación en la FA de las prescripciones, lo que supone una mejora en la seguridad y en la eficacia de los tratamientos. Se evidencia que el diseño y la implantación de mejoras en los sistemas de prescripción electrónica contribuye a aumentar la calidad de la prescripción.(AU)

Objective: To assess whether reporting the dosing frequency into the prescription module of the Institut Català de la Salut (ICS) primary care electronic clinical workstation improves the dosing frequency's adequacy of the prescriptions. Design: Before and after study with non-equivalent control of prescriptions without any change in the dosing frequency. The study periods includes from September 1st, 2019 to February 29th, 2020.Location: Primary care setting. Participants: Prescriptions issued by ICS General Practitioner, during the study period of those medicines which indications have a single appropriate dosing frequency or mostly appropriate, are included.Intervention: Recommendation of the appropriate dosing frequency in the prescription module. Main measurements: Adequacy defined as the coincidence between the prescribed dosing frequency and the appropriate dosing frequency. Results: After the intervention there was a 22.75% increase in prescriptions with adequate dosing frequency. The largest increase occurred in the medicines for the genitourinary system and sex hormones. In absolute terms, the group of anti infective for systemic use is the one that obtained more prescriptions with an adequate dosing frequency between the two periods. Conclusions: The intervention increased the dosing frequency's adequacy leading to improvements in the safety and effectiveness of the treatments. It is evident that the design and implementation of improvements in electronic prescription systems contributes to increasing the quality of the prescription.(AU)

Longitudinalidad en atención primaria y polifarmacia. Una revisión sistemática / Longitudinality in Primary Care and Polypharmacy. A Systematic Review

El objetivo de este trabajo es recopilar, evaluar e interpretar las evidencias disponibles sobre la relación existente entre el grado de longitudinalidad en atención primaria (AP) y la prevalencia de polifarmacia y sus problemas asociados. Siguiendo la declaración PRISMA realizamos una revisión sistemática de la literatura en las bases de datos PubMed y Scopus. El cribado por títulos y resúmenes, y la revisión de referencias realizados de forma independiente por 2 autores detectó 16 trabajos de potencial interés. Tras la revisión independiente de todos los originales, 4 fueron descartados por no satisfacer los criterios de inclusión. Los 12 trabajos seleccionados, 9 estudios de cohortes retrospectivos y 3 estudios transversales, estudiaban la relación de la longitudinalidad en AP, medida con diversos índices cuantitativos, con la prevalencia de polifarmacia y otros problemas terapéuticos asociados, como las prescripciones inadecuadas, las duplicidades o las interacciones medicamentosas. Todos mostraban una relación significativa, frecuentemente fuerte (RR>2 o<0,5), entre los indicadores de longitudinalidad y las diversas variables dependientes. Aunque nuestro conocimiento podría mejorar mediante estudios prospectivos que evaluaran directamente la longitudinalidad y su repercusión en los problemas por exceso de medicación, con las evidencias existentes, se puede afirmar que la protección y la promoción de la longitudinalidad en la AP es un elemento clave para el control de la polifarmacia y los problemas asociados (AU)

The aim of this work was to collect, evaluate and interpret the available evidence on the relationship between continuity in primary care (i.e., longitudinality), and the prevalence of polypharmacy and its associated problems. Following the PRISMA reporting statement, we carried out a systematic review of the literature searching PubMed and Scopus databases. The screening of titles and summaries and the review of references carried out independently by two authors detected 16 works of potential interest, of which 4 were discarded after the independent review of all the originals because they did not meet inclusion criteria. The 12 papers selected studied the relationship between Longitudinality, measured with various quantitative indices, and the rate of polypharmacy or various associated problems, such as duplicate drugs, inadequate prescriptions or drug interactions. They all showed a significant relationship, often strong (RR>2 or<0.5), between longitudinality indicators and the various dependent variables. Although our knowledge could be improved by prospective studies that more directly evaluate longitudinality and its impact on problems due to excess medication, with the existing evidence, we can affirm that the protection and promotion of continuity in primary care can be a key element for the control of polypharmacy and associated problems (AU)

A propósito de un caso: servicio de indicación farmacéutica en paciente con edema y varices / Regarding a case: pharmaceutical indication service in a patient with edema and varicose veins

Paciente varón de 69 años acude a la farmacia comunitaria solicitando una crema que le ayude a mejorar la hinchazón que presenta en las piernas. Para la evaluación de este caso clínico se ha seguido el esquema propuesto por Foro de Atención Farmacéutica en FC (Foro AF-FC). Se sospecha que se trata de un problema de salud insuficientemente tratado, dando lugar a un Resultado Negativo asociado a la Medicación (RNM). Se lleva a cabo el servicio de indicación farmacéutica y se registra en SEFAC e_XPERT INDICA+PRO. En la primera intervención se le recomienda una pomada a base de Polisulfato sódico 5 mg/g, así como consejos de salud. A las dos semanas se realiza la primera evaluación y el paciente presenta cierta mejoría, pero continúa con hinchazón en los tobillos. En la segunda visita se le indica unas medias de compresión normal y unas cápsulas a base de extractos naturales que le ayuden a eliminar líquidos, así como continuar con la pomada. En la segunda evaluación, comenta que la combinación propuesta le funciona bien y que el problema de salud está prácticamente resuelto. (AU)

Opinion on the benefits of nurse prescribing in Catalonia. Consensus of health professionals and managers.

OBJECTIVE: To study the level of agreement among health professionals and managers in Catalonia on the benefits of nurse prescribing (NP). METHOD: An online Real Time Delphi was conducted to collect the level of agreement of health professionals and managers. Participants voted in a 6-point scale (1 low benefit and 6 high benefit) for 12 items describing benefits of NP. A total of 1332 professionals participated. The level of consensus was calculated applying interquartile ranges of scores and standardized mean differences among subgroups using effect sizes (ES) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The scores indicate a general agreement on the perceived benefits of NP among participants. Standardized differences among scores on the perceived benefits among professionals were small to high (ES range between 0.2 and 1.2) between nurses and medical doctors and high between nurses and pharmacists (ES range: 1.2 and 2.4). Differences between scores of nurses and those of managers or other professionals in the present study were smaller for most voted benefits. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows an agreement on the benefits of NP. Nevertheless, when standardized scores are taken into consideration, differences among professionals' perceptions emerged, and aligned with documented barriers identified in the literature such as corporative aspects, cultural limitations, institutional and organisational inertia, beliefs and unawareness of what NP implies.

[Longitudinality in Primary Care and Polypharmacy. A Systematic Review]. / Longitudinalidad en atención primaria y polifarmacia. Una revisión sistemática.

The aim of this work was to collect, evaluate and interpret the available evidence on the relationship between continuity in primary care (i.e., longitudinality), and the prevalence of polypharmacy and its associated problems. Following the PRISMA reporting statement, we carried out a systematic review of the literature searching PubMed and Scopus databases. The screening of titles and summaries and the review of references carried out independently by two authors detected 16 works of potential interest, of which 4 were discarded after the independent review of all the originals because they did not meet inclusion criteria. The 12 papers selected studied the relationship between Longitudinality, measured with various quantitative indices, and the rate of polypharmacy or various associated problems, such as duplicate drugs, inadequate prescriptions or drug interactions. They all showed a significant relationship, often strong (RR>2 or<0.5), between longitudinality indicators and the various dependent variables. Although our knowledge could be improved by prospective studies that more directly evaluate longitudinality and its impact on problems due to excess medication, with the existing evidence, we can affirm that the protection and promotion of continuity in primary care can be a key element for the control of polypharmacy and associated problems.

[Does recommending the dosing frequency in the electronic prescription improve its adequacy? Before and after study]. / ¿Recomendar la frecuencia de administración de medicamentos en la prescripción electrónica mejora su adecuación? Estudio antes-después.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether reporting the dosing frequency into the prescription module of the Institut Català de la Salut (ICS) primary care electronic clinical workstation improves the dosing frequency's adequacy of the prescriptions. DESIGN: Before and after study with non-equivalent control of prescriptions without any change in the dosing frequency. The study periods includes from September 1st, 2019 to February 29th, 2020. LOCATION: Primary care setting. PARTICIPANTS: Prescriptions issued by ICS General Practitioner, during the study period of those medicines which indications have a single appropriate dosing frequency or mostly appropriate, are included. INTERVENTION: Recommendation of the appropriate dosing frequency in the prescription module. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Adequacy defined as the coincidence between the prescribed dosing frequency and the appropriate dosing frequency. RESULTS: After the intervention there was a 22.75% increase in prescriptions with adequate dosing frequency. The largest increase occurred in the medicines for the genitourinary system and sex hormones. In absolute terms, the group of anti infective for systemic use is the one that obtained more prescriptions with an adequate dosing frequency between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention increased the dosing frequency's adequacy leading to improvements in the safety and effectiveness of the treatments. It is evident that the design and implementation of improvements in electronic prescription systems contributes to increasing the quality of the prescription.

Atención farmacéutica al paciente ingresado en una unidad multidisciplinar de paciente crónico complejo / Pharmaceutical care for the patients admitted to a multidisciplinary complex chronic patient unit

Objetivo: evaluar la contribución del farmacéutico mediante el análisis de la prescripción potencialmente inapropiada y la conciliación del tratamiento domiciliario en la unidad de pacientes crónicos complejos de un hospital terciario. Métodos: estudio observacional, prospectivo y multidisciplinar de los pacientes de la unidad de pacientes crónicos complejos de un hospital durante febrero de 2019 - junio de 2020. El equipo multidisciplinar del crónico complejo elaboró un checklist con una selección de fármacos no recomendados basado en los criterios STOPP/START, Beers y PRISCUS y fármacos susceptibles de desprescripción según los criterios LESS-CHRON. El farmacéutico aplicaba el checklist diariamente en los pacientes que ingresaban en la unidad, además de realizar la conciliación del tratamiento domiciliario revisando el tratamiento prescrito con el detallado en la receta electrónica domiciliaria. Por eso, se recogieron las siguientes variables: edad, sexo y número de fármacos al ingreso como variables independientes, y variables dependientes: número de fármacos al alta, tipo de prescripción potencialmente inapropiada, motivos de conciliación, fármacos implicados y grado de aceptación de la recomendación por parte del médico prescriptor para evaluar la contribución farmacéutica. El análisis estadístico se realizó con IBM® SPSS® Statistics22. Resultados : se revisaron 621 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 84 años (56,4% mujeres), y se intervino en 218 (35,1%). La mediana del número de fármacos fue de 11 (2-26) al ingreso y de 10 (0-25) al alta. Se realizaron 373 intervenciones: 235 por conciliación de la medicación (78,3% aceptadas), 71 por medicamentos no recomendados (57,7% aceptadas), 42 por desprescripción (61,9% aceptadas) y 25 por otros motivos. ... (AU)

Objective: To assess the pharmacist’s contributions by analysing potentially inappropriate prescription and home treatment reconciliation in the complex chronic patient unit of a tertiary hospital.MethodObservational, prospective, multidisciplinary study of patients in the complex chronic patient unit of a hospital during February 2019 - June 2020. Multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic developed a checklist with a selection of non-recommended drugs based on STOPP/START, Beers and PRISCUS criteria, and drugs susceptible to deprescription according to LESS-CHRON criteria. The pharmacist applied the checklist daily in patients admitted to the unit, in addition to reconciling home treatment by reviewing the prescribed treatment with that detailed in the electronic home prescription. Therefore, the following variables were collected: age, sex and number of drugs on admission as independent variables, and dependent variables: number of drugs at discharge, type of potentially inappropriate prescription, reasons for reconciliation, drugs involved and degree of acceptance of the recommendation by the prescribing physician to assess the pharmaceutical contribution. The statistical analysis was performed with IBM® SPSS® Statistics22.Results: We reviewed 621 patients with a median age of 84 years (56.4% women), and intervention was performed in 218 (35.1%). The median number of drugs was 11 (2-26) at admission and 10 (0-25) at discharge 373 interventions were performed: 235 for medication reconciliation (78.3% accepted), 71 for non-recommended drugs (57.7% accepted), 42 for deprescription (61.9% accepted) and 25 for other reasons. Statistically significant differences were observed between the number of drugs at discharge and at admission in both intervention patients (n = 218) and complex chronic patients (n = 114) (p < 0.001 in both cases). ...(AU)

Caracterización de la utilización de colistín en un hospital de alta complejidad

Resumen: El aumento de la resistencia y la escasez de nuevos antibacterianos ha requerido la reintroducción de antiguos antimicrobianos entre ellos colistín. Objetivo: Caracterizar la utilización de colistín durante el año 2017 en un hospital universitario, mediante la descripción de los pacientes, los tratamientos, la microbiología asociada y efectos adversos. Pacientes y Métodos: Trabajo observacional retrospectivo. Se revisaron los datos de todos los pacientes que recibieron colistín intravenoso (IV) por al menos 48 horas, durante el año 2017. Resultados: Se incluyeron 53 pacientes, equivalentes a 91 tratamientos. El foco respiratorio fue el principal (46,2%). El 68,1% de los tratamientos fue iniciado en la UCI. La mayoría de los pacientes tenía una hospitalización reciente (83,5%), y presentaban uso previo de antibacterianos (89%). Los dos patógenos mayoritariamente identificados fueron Pseudomonas aeruginosa y Klebsiella spp. El consumo promedio de colistín fue de 2,4 DDD/100 camas/día. El servicio que más consumió colistín fue la UCI, con 45,5 DDD/100 camas/día, usando generalmente la dosis de 3 MUI cada 8 horas IV y con una baja utilización de dosis de carga. Conclusión: Colistín corresponde a un antimicrobiano de uso restringido a infecciones sospechadas o confirmadas por agentes bacterianos multi resistentes. En esta serie, su uso inicial fue principalmente empírico, en pacientes con factores de riesgo para resistencia antibacteriana; se usó en forma asociada a otros antimicrobianos, siendo el foco principal el respiratorio.

Background: The increase in resistance and the shortage of new antibiotics has led to the reintroduction of old antimicrobials such as colistin. Aim: To evaluate the use of colistin during 2017 in a university hospital, through the characterization of patients and treatment, associated microbiology, response to treatment and adverse effects. Methods: Retrospective observational design. The data of all patients who received colistin for at least 48 hours during the year 2017 were reviewed. Results: 55 patients were included, equivalent to 144 treatments. The respiratory focus was the main one (57.9%). 64% of the treatments began in the ICU, while 7% in the ward. Most of the patients has a recent hospitalization (86.8%) and has previous use of antibiotics (90.4%). The two main pathogens identified were Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella spp. In 87.1% of the cases with microbiological justifications for the use of colistin, a favorable response was obtained. The average consumption of colistin was 2.4 DDD/100 beds/day. The department that consumed the most colistin was the ICU, with 45,5 DDD/100 beds/day, generally using a dose of 3 MIU every 8 hours IV and with low use of loading doses. Conclusion: Colistin corresponds to an antibiotic whose use is restricted to infections suspected or confirmed by multi-resistant bacterial agents. Its initial use in this serie was mainly empirical, in patients with risk factors for antibiotics resistance, it was used in association with other antimicrobials, being the respiratory the main infectious focus.

Pharmaceutical care for the patients admitted to a multidisciplinary complex chronic patient unit. / [Artículo traducido] Atención farmacéutica al paciente ingresado en una unidad multidisciplinar de paciente crónico complejo.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacist's contributions by analysing potentially inappropriate prescription and home treatment reconciliation in the complex chronic patient unit of a tertiary hospital. METHOD: Observational, prospective, multidisciplinary study of patients in the complex chronic patient unit of a hospital during February 2019 - June 2020. Multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic developed a checklist with a selection of non-recommended drugs based on STOPP/START, Beers and PRISCUS criteria, and drugs susceptible to deprescription according to LESS-CHRON criteria. The pharmacist applied the checklist daily in patients admitted to the unit, in addition to reconciling home treatment by reviewing the prescribed treatment with that detailed in the electronic home prescription. Therefore, the following variables were collected: age, sex and number of drugs on admission as independent variables, and dependent variables: number of drugs at discharge, type of potentially inappropriate prescription, reasons for reconciliation, drugs involved and degree of acceptance of the recommendation by the prescribing physician to assess the pharmaceutical contribution. The statistical analysis was performed with IBM® SPSS® Statistics22. RESULTS: We reviewed 621 patients with a median age of 84 years (56.4% women), and intervention was performed in 218 (35.1%). The median number of drugs was 11 (2-26) at admission and 10 (0-25) at discharge 373 interventions were performed: 235 for medication reconciliation (78.3% accepted), 71 for non-recommended drugs (57.7% accepted), 42 for deprescription (61.9% accepted) and 25 for other reasons. Statistically significant differences were observed between the number of drugs at discharge and at admission in both intervention patients (n = 218) and complex chronic patients (n = 114) (p < 0.001 in both cases). Moreover, statistically significant differences were observed in the number of drugs at admission between patients included in the complex chronic programme and those not included (p = 0.001), and in the number of drugs at discharge (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of the pharmacist in the multidisciplinary team of the complex chronic patient unit improves patient safety and quality of care. The selected criteria were useful for detecting inappropriate drugs in this population and favoured deprescription.

Estudio transversal retrospectivo de la evolución del consumo de opioides farmacológicos y de heroína en un grupo poblacional del área de Barcelona / Retrospective cross-sectional study of the evolution of the use of pharmacological opioids and heroin in a population group in the Barcelona area

Antecedentes: La dependencia de opioides está causando una epidemia en Estados Unidos, pero, a diferencia de la de los años setenta, parece más relacionada con los opioides de prescripción que con la heroína.ObjetivosEl objetivo de este estudio es evaluar si esta nueva epidemia ha llegado ya a nuestro medio y ver si hay cambios en el consumo y en las características de los consumidores.Pacientes y métodosEstudio transversal retrospectivo. Se incluyeron 1.140 pacientes entre el periodo 2012 y 2019, 633 de los cuales fueron primeras visitas a Centros de Atención y Seguimiento a las drogadicciones (CAS), 502 corresponden a visitas en urgencias por problemas relacionados con sobredosis o abstinencia de heroína o de opioides con receta, y los 5 restantes son recién nacidos de madres adictas a la heroína. Se analizaron los datos demográficos y las características de las sustancias de abuso, comparándose entre períodos parciales.ResultadosSe produjo una disminución global de las primeras visitas de pacientes a los CAS que referían adicción a la heroína (p=0,001), mientras que los adictos a los opioides de farmacia se han mantenido estables. Ha habido un aumento irregular del total de urgencias, consultas por sobredosis y por abstinencia, tanto de heroína como de opioides con receta (p=0,062, p=0,166 y p=0,005, respectivamente). Las urgencias relacionadas con opioides han sido menos frecuentes que las relacionadas con heroína. Los pacientes europeos no españoles han aumentado respecto los españoles.ConclusiónNo se ha producido un aumento preocupante del abuso de heroína ni de opioides con receta en nuestro medio. (AU)

Background: Opioid dependence is causing an epidemic in the US, but unlike the 1970s it seems more related to prescription opioids than heroin.ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to assess whether this new epidemic has already reached our environment and to see if there are changes in consumption and in the characteristics of consumers.Patients and methodsRetrospective cross-sectional study. 1,140 patients were included between 2012 and 2019, 633 of whom were first visits to Drug Addiction Care and (CAS) Monitoring Centers, 502 corresponding to emergency room visits for problems related to overdose or withdrawal of heroin or opioids with prescription, and the remaining 5 are newborns of mothers addicted to heroin. Demographic data and characteristics of the substances of abuse were analyzed, comparing between partial periods.ResultsThere was a global decrease in the first visits of patients to the CAS who reported heroin addiction (P=.001), while those addicted to pharmacy opioids have remained stable. There has been an irregular increase in total emergency visits, overdose consultations, and withdrawal consultations, both for heroin and prescription opioids (P=.062, P=.166 and P=.005, respectively). Opioid-related emergencies have been less frequent than for heroin. Non-Spanish European patients have increased compared to Spanish patients.ConclusionThere has been no worrying increase in heroin or prescription opioid abuse in our setting. (AU)